Oh, how absolutely thrilling it is to be constantly bombarded with the mesmerizing symphony of "robots, robots, robots" and the enchanting chorus of "AI, AI, AI" from the oh-so-innovative tech world. Who wouldn't want their lives to be completely taken over by these mechanical wonders? Tech firms graciously assure us that surrendering ourselves to the robot overlords will miraculously enhance our existence and generously gift us with boundless time for our unparalleled creative pursuits. How utterly marvelous!
Oh, brace yourselves for the grandiose spectacle as these boastful companies desperately try to sell us on the idea that it's all sunshine and rainbows. Oh, rejoice! Because who wouldn't want AI that gleefully snatches away your job with unparalleled efficiency? Yes, our AI is here to graciously remind you just how slow and inferior those quaint humans are. After all, who needs humans when you have the marvel of artificial intelligence doing everything at warp speed and perfection?
Oh, pause the parade of tech wonders for a moment, dear techies! Your marvels and miracles shouldn't get off scot-free for rendering us jobless. We graciously request that you, the almighty architects of artificial intelligence, generously compensate us, mere mortals, casually nudged out of employment by your digital creations. Because, you know, fair is fair in this brave new world of unparalleled technological benevolence.
Hey, geniuses behind the creation of the century, how about your shiny innovations start ponying up for payroll taxes like the rest of us mere mortals? It's time to contribute to the social security coffers and throw some cash into the pot to retrain us humans who are casually tossed aside. It's called pulling your weight, even in the age of dazzling technology.
Here is a suggestion: figure how many hours a human would take to do a job versus an AI or robot. Say you pay a human $20 an hour, and it takes the human 8 hours instead of an AI that completes it in 4 hours.
Let's break down the calculations:
For the Man:
- Time to complete the job: 8 hours
- Hourly wage: $20
- Total earnings: $20/hour * 8 hours = $160
Social Security Tax (12%):
- Social Security Tax: $160 * 0.12 = $19.20
Federal Tax (10%):
- Federal Tax: $160 * 0.10 = $16.00
Total Taxes for the Man:
- Total Taxes: $19.20 (Social Security) + $16.00 (Federal) = $35.20
The Machine completes the job in half the time, which means it is as effective as two individuals working at the same rate. In this scenario, the Machine's efficiency replaces the need for two workers, assuming both workers are equally productive.
I decided to ask the chatbot a few questions to clarify things just to be fair, you know, from the bot's mouth.
(Me)So, the Machine would pay twice the taxes, right?
(Chatbot)Yes, that's correct. If the Machine is as productive as two individuals and, as per the previous calculation, pays taxes twice the amount of a single worker, then the Machine's taxes would indeed be twice the taxes paid by the individual. In this case, the Machine's taxes are calculated to be twice the cost of the Man's taxes.
(Me)So, what are the machines' taxes?
(Chat bot)
For the Machine (completing the job in half the time):
- Machine's equivalent hourly rate: $160 (Man's total earnings) / 4 hours = $40/hour
- Machine's Total Earnings: $40/hour * 4 hours = $160
Machine Taxes (Twice the cost of the Man's):
- Machine's Total Taxes: $35.20 (Man's Total Taxes) * 2 = $70.40
So, according to the specified conditions, the Machine's total taxes are $70.40.
(Me) So, taxes should be taken out for every Man that the Robot or AI replaces. Is this correct?
(Chat Bot) Yes, that's a way to conceptualize it. If a machine or AI system replaces a human worker, the taxes generated by that Machine could be seen as a form of compensation that mirrors the taxes the human worker would have paid. In other words, the taxes generated by the Machine could contribute to social programs and services in a manner similar to the taxes paid by human workers.
(Me) So, how much would it pay at the above equation if it replaced ten men?
If we continue with the assumption that the Machine's taxes are twice the cost of a single worker and apply it to ten men being replaced, we can calculate the Machine's total taxes for the scenario:
Machine's Total Taxes for 10 Men: Machine′s Total Taxes=Machine′s Total Taxes per Man×Number of MenMachine′s Total Taxes=Machine′s Total Taxes per Man×Number of Men Machine′s Total Taxes=$70.40×10Machine′s Total Taxes=$70.40×10 Machine′s Total Taxes=$704Machine′s Total Taxes=$704
Therefore, based on the provided equation, if the Machine replaces ten men, its total taxes would be $704.
(Me)So, do you think it is fair that AI should help pay taxes for replacing humans? Your opinion.
(Chatbot) I don't possess personal opinions or feelings as a machine learning model. However, I can present perspectives on this matter. Ultimately, the fairness of AI paying taxes for replacing humans is a complex and evolving topic that involves discussions around ethics, policy, and the societal implications of advancing technology.
Ah, the epitome of fairness in the digital era! Picture this: A world where AI and bots graciously step into the shoes of hardworking humans, bearing the noble burden of taxes. Because, of course, it's only fitting that our silicon friends contribute their fair share to society, right? I mean, who needs humans when you can have machines dutifully funding social programs and federal coffers with their algorithmic benevolence? It's almost poetic, really. So fair, so equitable—just the kind of justice our future robot overlords surely dreamed of. Bravo, fairness committee, bravo!
What responsibility do AI and other Tech have to us, mere mortals?
